The Gadgets Page

September 11, 2006

A Display That Adapts To Sunlight

Filed under: PDAs and Phones — Laura Moncur @ 11:45 am

You are looking at a DDI. It is the part of the mobile phone that controls the LCD screen. This one, from Samsung has genius to it. It automatically adjusts the brightness of the LCD screen depending on how bright the light is outside. Instead of cupping your hand around your mobile phone when you are outside, you’ll be able to easily see the screen.

Samsung's Intelligent Mobile Display Driver IC (DDI)

Why did it take so long for a company to come up with this idea? Samsung’s new mobile phone display will sense the light levels when the phone is activated and adjust the screen accordingly. If it’s bright outside, the screen will be brighter. If it’s dark, the screen will dim in order to save battery power.

They call it the Intelligent Mobile Display Driver IC (DDI). In the past, DDI have just controlled the LCD screen. This new DDI will adjust the power depending on how bright the ambient light is. They will begin production of this by the end of this year.

Via: Samsung’s new display adapts to sunlight – Yahoo! News

September 8, 2006

Review: OpenOffice

Filed under: Reviews,Software — Laura Moncur @ 5:00 am

I have been playing with OpenOffice for a couple of weeks now and I thought I would give you all the details. OpenOffice is a free, open source office suite for Windows, Linux and Solaris operating systems.

I downloaded the Windows version. The first thing I noticed is that it didn’t take forever to boot up and it didn’t suck down my resources. When I Beta tested the new MS Office, I took it off my computer within a few hours of installing it because it made my computer so slow. I have a pretty nice computer that performs well with video editing software, but the new MS Office made it crawl like a turtle when I used it, so I removed it. That wasn’t the case for OpenOffice. It runs smoothly.

It also opens MS Office documents and can save in that format. My Excel documents loaded in Calc (including all the sheets) and looked exactly like they did in Excel. That wasn’t the case when I uploaded Excel spreadsheets into the Google online spreadsheet. The charts where messed up and the pages looked completely different. Calc really beats Google spreadsheet in that case.

There were a few small things that I noticed that might affect your decision.

  • The software is different from Word and Excel: If you have trouble learning new things, there would be an adjustment period. I was able to easily find the things that I usually use, but not everyone can learn software quickly. If that is problem for you, it might be worth it to pay the $400 for Microsoft Office. Of course, for $400, I’m willing to put up with a little confusion.

  • It isn’t perfect: There are small things that might make you wish for your old MS Office, like passwords. You can password protect documents, but only in the OpenOffice format, not the MS Office formats. When I cut and pasted some cells in Calc (their spreadsheet program) the formulas that were based on those cells didn’t automatically correct like they do with MS Excel. That is a minor thing that is different than Excel and might even be a preference that I can change, but it’s an example of their programs not being “perfect”.

  • It might not be around forever: If you are scared that OpenOffice won’t be around in the future, you might want to stick with MS Office. OpenOffice is an open source product of Sun Microsystems, so that gives it some stability in the unstable world of computers, but there is an old saying, “No one ever got fired for buying Microsoft.” Of course, that saying used to be, “No one ever got fired for buying IBM,” and they aren’t quite the market leader that they used to be. There are really no guarantees no matter which software you use.

Most importantly, you can’t beat the price. OpenOffice is free and available for download here:

For that price, give the software a test run and see how you like it. Maybe you will be able to take that old bootleg copy of MS Office off your computer and free up a little memory while you’re at it.

September 7, 2006

Steve Jobs Introduced the iPod in 2001

Filed under: Audio and Video — Laura Moncur @ 3:09 pm

Here is some footage of Steve Jobs introducing the very first iPod. It held 1000 songs (5GB) and was the size of a deck of cards.

Some thoughts:

  • Steve Jobs thought that my entire music library was 1000 songs and back then, that was probably true for a bunch of people. Now, our libraries swell at 60GB and 12,000 songs. Is it peer-to-peer sharing or are our music collections growing with the drive size of the iPods?

  • This introduction is missing the most fashionable piece of the iPod, its white earbuds. Sometimes I believe it was the earbuds that launched the iPod. The sillouhetted dancing figures and the conspicuous white wires hanging from our ears announced to the world that we owned the “correct” MP3 player.

  • Back then, I opted for the MP3 CD player that played 150 songs for a $1 a song. It still works and runs on a single AA battery, unlike the wheezing hard drive of my original iPod. Of course, it wasn’t as cool as the iPod by any stretch of the imagination.

  • Steve insists on showing the back first. I compare it to the scratched stainless steel back of my own original iPod and the five years haven’t been good to it.

  • I watched this introduction right after watching the 1984 introduction of the Macintosh. The audience isn’t cheering or excited at all. What changed? In retrospect, the iPod is just as pivotal as the Mac. Why is the audience so subdued?

It was interesting to watch this video after five years. I forget that there was a time when Steve might have had to convince the world that the iPod was a good idea. It was fun to see this slice of the past.

September 6, 2006

Online Word Processor from Google

Filed under: Software — Laura Moncur @ 1:13 pm

Writely from GoogleFirst, Google was testing an online spreadsheet, now they also have an online word processor. If you have a computer, but no Microsoft Office, this might be an option for you:

Of course, if you don’t own MS Office, there are other options for you that don’t require an Internet connection in order to run them, like Open Office:

Open Office is a free open-source office suite that allows you to write documents, work with spreadsheets and even draw pictures. That is another option for you.

Via: Boing Boing: Google launches free, kick-ass word-processor

September 5, 2006

The Nintendo DS Lite in Black and Pink

Filed under: Toys and Games — Laura Moncur @ 2:01 pm

Nintendo DS Lite Coral PinkJust when I said that you can’t slap a coat of pink paint on something to make me want it, I’m proven wrong! I hate it when I have to take back my words. Nintendo is releasing the DS Lite in Pink and Black. I liked the pink one so much, I actually talked to the game store to see how much I would get for my white DS Lite if I turned it in toward a pink one. They’ll only give me $65 dollars for it. I would do better to sell it on eBay.

Nintendo DS Lite Onyx BlackI feel such a strange feeling of girliness about me. Is it the fact that it’s a light coral pink instead of PeptoBismol colored? Could it be that the game marketers were right, they just chose the wrong shade of pink? I’m not a girly girl at all, why do I want the pink one so bad that I’m willing to deal with the hassle of eBay just to get the pink one? I would truly worry about myself (and maybe even give myself a pregnancy test) if Mike hadn’t felt the same way about the black one.

Maybe it’s not the novelty of the pink. Maybe I’m just sick of iPod white.

These silicone skin cases are only 14 bucks and do about the same thing, so I think I’ll opt for them instead.

Silicone Skin for Nitendo Ds Lite NDS Lite Console

Maybe I just want to be able to tell my DS apart from Mike’s. They come in gray, clear, pink, aqua and green! Now, green is the color for me! It won’t make me feel so weird and girly inside.

My Green Silicone Skin for the DS Lite

September 4, 2006

Jansport LiveWire Backpack

Filed under: Audio and Video,Clothing — Laura Moncur @ 5:00 am

The LiveWire iPod controlsLast January at CES, we saw a backpack from O’Neill that worked with your iPod. Now, Jansport has also added that feature with their LiveWire backpacks. They range in price from $60 to $300 for the BlueTooth version.

Just like the O’Neill backpack. the controls for the iPod are on the shoulder of the pack. This allows you to keep the iPod in the backpack and turn it off, on and change songs using the shoulder controls. It was an ingenius idea when O’Neill released their backpacks, but their prices were astronomical. At $60, the Jansport backpacks are actually affordable.

Here is a list of the packs available:

The fact that you can easily order these backpacks from Amazon.com gives Jansport a huge leg up on the O’Neill backpacks. When I tried to order them when they came out, I couldn’t get through their complicated website. Jansport has made it easy and affordable.

September 1, 2006

REVA Electric Car

Filed under: Cars & Transportation — Laura Moncur @ 6:01 am

My choice in colors for a Reva car.Just when I had my heart set on a Smart Car, India comes up with an even cuter electric car for the city:

I love this little car, but it’s not available in the United States. After designing my Reva with my favorite colors and choices, I clicked on the “Buy this Reva” button, but it assumed I lived in India, giving me only choices for Indian cities.

Room for the whole family.I am really drawn to the efficient and small cars that are available all across the world, but haven’t hit the states yet. I especially enjoy some of the marketing. Look at this picture of the mother and her two children. The car might be small, but it’s big enough to pack in two grade-school kids with Mom and Dad.

Why haven’t the American car companies jumped on this bandwagon? Do they assume that we enjoy gas-guzzling? I can’t wait until the small car phenomenon hits the United States!

Via: Popgadget: Personal Tech for Women

August 31, 2006

The iPod Vending Machine

Filed under: Audio and Video — Laura Moncur @ 3:11 pm

While we were in Las Vegas, we stayed at the Las Vegas Hilton. In the lobby by the elevators to our room, stood this machine, the iPod vending machine.

Here is a video of a girl buying an iPod from the same vending machine:

Just like buying a Diet Coke, you could punch up your order, swipe your card and you’ve got the newest 60MB Video iPod at your disposal. The prices weren’t even marked up. They were for sale at the same price as the local Fry’s.

We had all dismissed it as a novelty until we saw someone plunk down $250 for an iPod on the spur of the moment. The arm of the machine smoothly picked up the iPod and placed it in the bin (no dropping like they do with the bag of potato chips). The guy reached down and picked up his new, beautiful personal entertainment device and a whole new world opened up to me: a world in which I can buy an iPod in the hotel lobby like a candy bar or a bottle of Diet Coke.


This video shows how smoothly the machine delivers your product:

Apparently, there is also one in San Francisco:

And Atlanta:

August 30, 2006

Get a Mac – Apple’s New Commercials

Filed under: Computers and Peripherals — Laura Moncur @ 7:03 pm

Apple has a whole new wave of commercials featuring PC and Mac. Instead of wanting to punch the Mac kid in the gut, I actually laughed. These commercials are enjoyable AND they show the little ways that Macs are better without insulting my intelligence.

After hating their other commercials with the same idea, I’m surprised at how much I like these ones. I don’t know if they toned down the smarmyness of the Mac or if they used better reasons why the Mac is the kind of computer to use, but I really liked these. You can see them all right here:

Click here to see the video

I love the Angel/Demon commercial:

“Oh, FUN! We tried that once. It was nothing but pain and frustration!”

For some reason, these commercials turned the mocking from an external source (Mac) to an internal source (PC). It’s almost like PC is berating himself for not being a Mac and that makes it much more acceptable to me.

Good job, Apple. I like these commercials MUCH better!

Via: New Get a Mac commercial airs during Emmys – The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)

August 29, 2006

Review: Shield Zone Invisible Shield

Filed under: PDAs and Phones,Reviews — Christy Strebe @ 5:00 am

Invisible Shield

ShieldZone markets a line of plastic film gadget protectors called Invisible Shield. They’re similar to a screen protector except they cover the entire device (including the screen). Do they actually protect your device? Do they stand up to wear and tear without coming off? Can a non-professional actually put them on without making the gadget look like a grade-school craft project? And how do they look? We reveal all in our review.

What it is

ShieldZone sells a line of plastic protective liners for electronic devices. As of this writing, they support 450 of the most common electronic devices including video games, cellular phones, iPods, and PDAs. Considering the breadth of their line, they’re likely to have an Invisible Shield for every device you own. Prices start at $19.95, so this is no cheap screen protector.

The Invisible Shield comes in a package as a page or two of clear stickers, a flat plastic squeegee, and a small spray bottle of fluid. The only thing that changes between the various packages is the cut shape of the sticky material. We tested the Invisible Shield for the Palm Treo 650 and for the Sony PSP. In both samples we received, the label on the spray bottle had been applied to the wrong end of the bottle over the cap and had to be removed in order to open the bottle. Otherwise, the product quality was high.

The clingy material that the stickers are made out of similar to the material that has been sold as screen protectors for years. The spray bottle contains a non-stick fluid that prevents the clingy stickers from actually sticking until the fluid evaporates. It is this fluid that differentiates the Invisible Shield from similar competitors.

How it Works

To apply the stickers, you remove them from their backing paper, spray them, and apply them to your device. Because they go on slightly wet, you can easily reposition them before they dry and stick in place. If you’ve ever tried to apply a screen protector to a cell-phone or PDA, you’ll know why the ability to reposition the sticker after you’ve applied it is important: It’s basically impossible to do it correctly the first time.

Some devices have pieces that are incredibly convoluted: For example, the upper back piece of the Treo 650 is extraordinarily difficult to remove without getting its many odd appendages stuck to one another. It is a frustrating problem that would probably cause about half of the people using this product to give up in frustration.

The solution is to spray your fingers before you start and to spray the pieces before and as you remove them. This is also the solution to pieces that stick to your fingers—just spray them, and your finger will unstick. But I had to figure this out for myself—the whole job would have been much easier if the instructions mentioned this.

The liquid is not an adhesive—it’s actually an anti-adhesive that prevents the pieces from sticking while you slide them into place on the device, and it dramatically reduces the number of bubbles you’ll get under the film. In fact, the easiest piece to apply on the Treo 650 was the screen protector, and it went on simpler and more cleanly than any other sticky screen protector I’ve used. Using the spray also allows you to line up the plastic film pieces after you’ve applied them to the device, for perfect alignment that’s simply not possible using sticky backed adhesive film without the spray. These were actually the easiest plastic film protectors to apply that I’ve ever used, but only after I figured out that you want to spray your fingers and the film as you remove it.

The individual film pieces are convoluted because wrapping 3D surfaces is a topologically complex operation. Unfortunately, the film pieces generally split around corners, leaving the apex of the corner unprotected—exactly the spot that’s most likely to be hit when you drop it. In my opinion, the designers should have spent more effort covering the corners and protrusions with extra pieces. Furthermore, some of the corner areas were impossible to completely tamp down while the adhesive was wet, and had to be stuck down after the liquid had evaporated, which increases the odds of trapping a bubble.

I’m not sure what the spray is, but it is non-toxic and not at all harmful according to the bottle. It has no smell, and leaves no residue. I hope it’s non-conductive as well, but I didn’t see any indications of such. The instructions recommend removing the battery from your device and leaving it out until the spray evaporates.

The PSP Invisible Shield was an entirely different matter—it was essentially a large rectangle rather than the delicate filaments required for the Treo 650. The only problem I encountered with it was that despite drenching it with spray, it was large enough to be somewhat difficult to move around on the device—but it was possible to move it around, just more difficult than the small pieces on the Treo. It went on quickly and easily, smoothed out very rapidly, and had very few trapped bubbles, all of which were easy to tamp down. The cover did not interfere with any of the controls, and provided a matte finish to the display that I prefer to the shiny reflective surface of the PSP.

The PSP was considerably easier to protect than the Treo because it was one large flat piece. The only minor problem I encountered was that it was difficult to get the large piece to slide around after application because I hadn’t actually covered it completely with the spray. It was easy to remove and re-spray to get it right, and I was then able to slide it around to line it up perfectly.

Our Review

I would consider putting one of these shields to be mandatory if you want to keep a PSP nice—it actually hid the many scratches on the display of my PSP. However, the sticker is a matte finish, so you’ll loose the glossy look of the PSP screen. I don’t like the glossy finish of the PSP display because it reflects glare, so I consider this to be a feature. If you like the glossy look, you won’t be able to use a screen protector.

The film really is pretty much invisible—the most noticeable change to your gadget will be the way it feels. Instead of a slippery metal or plastic surface, it will have a tactile, softer, and almost rubber feel to it that’s easier to grip.

If you’ve got a gadget you’d like to keep nice, Invisible Shields are a good way to do it. I tend not to like cases that make devices bulkier because I usually carry devices like PDAs, cell phones, and iPods in my pocket. For video games, your options are a bit wider so cases can make sense, but consider an Invisible Shield anyway—they don’t change the look of your device at all, and they definitely protect the finish. They probably won’t protect your device from serious damage due to dropping the way a good case can, so you need to decide what type of damage you’re looking to avoid before you invest in a protector. I definitely recommend them for iPod nanos, PSPs, and other gossy screen devices that are likely to get scratched.

An unexpected benefit is that the film is tackier than the device itself, which makes them easier to hold and less likely to slip around on surfaces like your dashboard or center console.

I’ll definitely be wrapping my new gadgets in the future.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress
(c) 2003-2017 Michael Moncur, Laura Moncur, Matthew Strebe, and The Gadgets Page